[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201120124816.2ncbm75v4c5xrtw3@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:48:16 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: pca9685: Add staggered-outputs property
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:36:54PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > The pca9685 driver supports a new staggered-outputs property for reduced
> > > current surges and EMI. This adds documentation for the new DT property.
> >
> > Maybe point out the commit that added this support here?
>
> The pca9685 driver patch was not yet accepted and there will be a v2.
>
> Should I wait until the support is in Linus' tree and only then send a
> dt-bindings documentation patch, mentioning the commit?
Then I'd say add the dt-bindings patch to the series adding this
support.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists