[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38db3c2d5d51432b95cd1011c9f83c27@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 04:09:02 +0000
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for
split_lock_detect parameter
Hi, Randy,
> > + ratelimit:N -
> > + Set rate limit to N bus locks per second
> > + for bus lock detection. 0 < N <= HZ/2 and
> > + N is approximate. Only applied to non-root
> > + users.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know what this means. I think it's the "and N is
> appropriate"
> that is confusing me.
>
> 0 < N <= HZ/2 and N is appropriate.
You are right. I will remove "and N is appropriate" in the next version.
Could you please ack this patch? Can I add Acked-by from you in the updated patch?
Thank you very much for your review!
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists