linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for split_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <171caa46-8431-ee58-2cad-954cb63cb1f3@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:12:07 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for
 split_lock_detect parameter

On 11/20/20 8:09 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> Hi, Randy,
> 
>>> +			ratelimit:N -
>>> +				  Set rate limit to N bus locks per second
>>> +				  for bus lock detection. 0 < N <= HZ/2 and
>>> +				  N is approximate. Only applied to non-root
>>> +				  users.
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't know what this means. I think it's the "and N is
>> appropriate"
>> that is confusing me.
>>
>> 	0 < N <= HZ/2 and N is appropriate.
> 
> You are right. I will remove "and N is appropriate" in the next version.
> 
> Could you please ack this patch? Can I add Acked-by from you in the updated patch?
> 
> Thank you very much for your review!

Sure, no problem.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

thanks.
-- 
~Randy