linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: phy: add support for shared interrupts (part 3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:37:13 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: phy: add support for shared
 interrupts (part 3)

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:13:11 +0100 Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Ioana Ciornei (15):
> >   net: phy: intel-xway: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> >   net: phy: intel-xway: remove the use of .ack_interrupt()
> >   net: phy: icplus: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> >   net: phy: icplus: remove the use .ack_interrupt()
> >   net: phy: meson-gxl: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> >   net: phy: meson-gxl: remove the use of .ack_callback()  
> I will check the six patches above on Saturday (due to me being very
> busy with my daytime job)
> if that's too late for the netdev maintainers then I'm not worried
> about it. at first glance this looks fine to me. and we can always fix
> things afterwards (but still before -rc1).

That is a little long for patches to be hanging around. I was planning
to apply these on Wed. If either Ioana or you would prefer to get the
testing performed first, please split those patches out and repost once
they get validated.