[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123225544.bywwgcoa75kmapad@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:55:44 +0200
From: Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: phy: add support for shared
interrupts (part 3)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 02:37:13PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:13:11 +0100 Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > > Ioana Ciornei (15):
> > > net: phy: intel-xway: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> > > net: phy: intel-xway: remove the use of .ack_interrupt()
> > > net: phy: icplus: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> > > net: phy: icplus: remove the use .ack_interrupt()
> > > net: phy: meson-gxl: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
> > > net: phy: meson-gxl: remove the use of .ack_callback()
> > I will check the six patches above on Saturday (due to me being very
> > busy with my daytime job)
> > if that's too late for the netdev maintainers then I'm not worried
> > about it. at first glance this looks fine to me. and we can always fix
> > things afterwards (but still before -rc1).
>
> That is a little long for patches to be hanging around. I was planning
> to apply these on Wed. If either Ioana or you would prefer to get the
> testing performed first, please split those patches out and repost once
> they get validated.
If there is no issue reported in the meantime, I would say to apply the
series. I can always quickly fixup any problems that Martin might find.
Ioana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists