linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: make the eMMC and SD card controllers use fixed indices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:09:23 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: make the eMMC and SD card
 controllers use fixed indices

Am 2020-11-20 10:30, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:04:02AM +0000, Y.b. Lu wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>> 
>> I have already upstreamed a patch for all affected layerscape boards.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/commit/?h=imx/dt64&id=342ab37ecaf8c1b10dd3ca9a1271db29a6af0705
>> 
>> Please check whether it works for you.
> 
> Thanks, one can tell that I haven't done my due diligence of checking
> Shawn's tree first. I'll cherry-pick that patch and carry on with my
> work.
> 
> However, the fact still remains that Michael has expressed his opinion
> regarding mmcblk0 vs mmcblk1. Do you think that we could make the
> aliases a per-board option instead of per-SoC? Consider that there 
> might
> even be boards that only use SD card. It would be strange for the block
> device in that case to be called /dev/mmcblk1.

Yangbo, any news on this? I'd like to have this resorted out before it 
is
set in stone for 5.10.

-- 
-michael