lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160623222905.5095.18294249015305684225.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:37:09 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <pduplessis@...icios.com>,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tracing: Remove duplicate `type` field from regmap `regcache_sync` trace event

On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:57:30 -0500, Philippe Duplessis-Guindon wrote:
> I have an error saying that `regcache_sync` has 2 fields named `type`
> while using libtraceevent.
> 
> Erase the `int field` type, which is not assigned. This field is
> introduced by mistake and this commit removes it.
> 
> Fixes commit 593600890110c ("regmap: Add the regcache_sync trace event")

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: Remove duplicate `type` field from regmap `regcache_sync` trace event
      commit: e6e9354b58307c120afbdc2719a6093638c37446

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ