[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201124195407.GA16042@andrea>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:54:07 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Juan Vazquez <juvazq@...rosoft.com>,
Saruhan Karademir <skarade@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Avoid use-after-free in
vmbus_onoffer_rescind()
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:26:33PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Andrea Parri (Microsoft) wrote:
> > When channel->device_obj is non-NULL, vmbus_onoffer_rescind() could
> > invoke put_device(), that will eventually release the device and free
> > the channel object (cf. vmbus_device_release()). However, a pointer
> > to the object is dereferenced again later to load the primary_channel.
> > The use-after-free can be avoided by noticing that this load/check is
> > redundant if device_obk is non-NULL: primary_channel must be NULL if
>
> device_obk -> device_obj
Fixed.
>
> > device_obj is non-NULL, cf. vmbus_add_channel_work().
> >
>
> Missing a Fixes tag?
Yes, I've added the tag.
Thanks,
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists