linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] usb: typec: Consolidate sysfs ABI documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACeCKadOnMYjHXcVARAESbrmT5RPaoK4moJBfs0QfN2o38hPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:50:40 -0800
From:   Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:USB NETWORKING DRIVERS" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] usb: typec: Consolidate sysfs ABI documentation

Hi Heikki,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:53 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:46:06AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:32:35PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:10:31PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > > > Both partner and cable have identity VDOs. These are listed separately
> > > > in the Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-typec. Factor these out
> > > > into a common location to avoid the duplication.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogeurus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > I copied the Acked-by line from v3 [1] as is, but looks like there was a
> > > typo there and the email address should be
> > > "heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com".
> > >
> > > Please let me know if it's fine as is or whether I should send another
> > > patchset.
> >
> > It is fine. Thanks for taking care of that :-)
>
> Arch, no. It's not fine (I don't know what I'm talking about there). I
> think it would be better that you do resend.

Got it. v5 sent [1]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20201125084911.1077462-1-pmalani@chromium.org/

Thanks,

-Prashant