[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOpu5GN6xyYmAFuYWEPb3C6a_vwTV76pPU_8Vtw9BnF_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:50:08 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aleksandr Nogikh <a.nogikh@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] net, mac80211, kernel: enable KCOV remote coverage
collection for 802.11 frame handling
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 17:45, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:24:52 +0100 Marco Elver wrote:
> > This patch series enables remote KCOV coverage collection during 802.11
> > frames processing. These changes make it possible to perform
> > coverage-guided fuzzing in search of remotely triggerable bugs.
>
> Hi Marco, this stuff is only present in net-next, and were not reverted.
>
> You need to rebase and replace the existing implementation.
Ah, that's fine then. I wasn't sure if you can drop and replace things
in -net. I'll send a revert and change the implementation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists