linux-kernel - Re: [Y2038][time namespaces] Question regarding CLOCK_REALTIME support plans in Linux time namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100
From:   Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Zack Weinberg <zackw@...ix.com>,
        Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
        Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [Y2038][time namespaces] Question regarding CLOCK_REALTIME
 support plans in Linux time namespaces

On Nov 25 2020, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote:

> We might write a syscall interception framework using seccomp
> and SECCOMP_RET_TRACE, but that involves ptrace'ing the process
> under test, and is equivalent to a micro-sandbox. I'm not against
> that idea for testing; we would test what we ship.

seccomp and ptrace does not work with qemu linux-user.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."