[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mtz41qak.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:21:55 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zack Weinberg <zackw@...ix.com>,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [Y2038][time namespaces] Question regarding CLOCK_REALTIME
support plans in Linux time namespaces
On Nov 25 2020, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote:
> We might write a syscall interception framework using seccomp
> and SECCOMP_RET_TRACE, but that involves ptrace'ing the process
> under test, and is equivalent to a micro-sandbox. I'm not against
> that idea for testing; we would test what we ship.
seccomp and ptrace does not work with qemu linux-user.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists