linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] syscalls: avoid time() using __cvdso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c77c4306-6a7e-01f5-c338-ec1c8ef2c0c6@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:36:54 +0000
From:   Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>, Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com>
Cc:     ltp@...ts.linux.it, Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] syscalls: avoid time() using __cvdso_gettimeofday in
 use-level's VDSO

Hi Thomas.

On 11/25/20 11:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[...]

>>> Here we propose to use '__NR_time' to invoke syscall directly that makes
>>> test all get real seconds via ktime_get_real_second.
> 
> This is a general problem and not really just for this particular test
> case.
> 
> Due to the internal implementation of ktime_get_real_seconds(), which is
> a 2038 safe replacement for the former get_seconds() function, this
> accumulation issue can be observed. (time(2) via syscall and newer
> versions of VDSO use the same mechanism).
> 
>      clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
>      sec = time();
>      assert(sec >= ts.tv_sec);
> 
> That assert can trigger for two reasons:
> 
>  1) Clock was set between the clock_gettime() and time().
> 
>  2) The clock has advanced far enough that:
> 
>     timekeeper.tv_nsec + (clock_now_ns() - last_update_ns) > NSEC_PER_SEC
> 
> #1 is just a property of clock REALTIME. There is nothing we can do
>    about that.
> 
> #2 is due to the optimized get_seconds()/time() access which avoids to
>    read the clock. This can happen on bare metal as well, but is far
>    more likely to be exposed on virt.
> 
> The same problem exists for CLOCK_XXX vs. CLOCK_XXX_COARSE
> 
>      clock_gettime(CLOCK_XXX, &ts);
>      clock_gettime(CLOCK_XXX_COARSE, &tc);
>      assert(tc.tv_sec >= ts.tv_sec);
> 
> The _COARSE variants return their associated timekeeper.tv_sec,tv_nsec
> pair without reading the clock. Same as #2 above just extended to clock
> MONOTONIC.
> 
> There is no way to fix this except giving up on the fast accessors and
> make everything take the slow path and read the clock, which might make
> a lot of people unhappy.
> 
> For clock REALTIME #1 is anyway an issue, so I think documenting this
> proper is the right thing to do.
> 
> Thoughts?
>

I completely agree with your analysis and the fact that we should document this
information.

My proposal would be to use either the vDSO document present in the kernel [1]
or the man pages for time(2) and clock_gettime(2). Probably the second would be
more accessible to user space developers.

[1] Documentation/ABI/stable/vdso

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo