linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v22 07/18] mm/page_idle: Avoid interferences from concurrent users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201126133715.4468-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:37:15 +0100
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
CC:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
        <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <amit@...nel.org>,
        <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "David Hildenbrand" <david@...hat.com>, <dwmw@...zon.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>,
        <foersleo@...zon.de>, "Greg Thelen" <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, <sj38.park@...il.com>,
        <snu@...zon.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, <zgf574564920@...il.com>,
        <linux-damon@...zon.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 07/18] mm/page_idle: Avoid interferences from concurrent users

On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:30:27 -0800 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:06 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> >
> > Concurrent Idle Page Tracking users can interfere each other because the
> > interface doesn't provide a central rule for synchronization between the
> > users.  Users could implement their own synchronization rule, but even
> > in that case, applications developed by different users would not know
> > how to synchronize with others.  To help this situation, this commit
> > introduces a centralized synchronization infrastructure of Idle Page
> > Tracking.
> >
> > In detail, this commit introduces a mutex lock for Idle Page Tracking,
> > called 'page_idle_lock'.  It is exposed to user space via a new bool
> > sysfs file, '/sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/lock'.  By writing to and reading
> > from the file, users can hold/release and read status of the mutex.
> > Writes to the Idle Page Tracking 'bitmap' file fails if the lock is not
> > held, while reads of the file can be done regardless of the lock status.
> >
> > Note that users could still interfere each other if they abuse this
> > locking rule.  Nevertheless, this change will let them notice the rule.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> 
> I don't think this is allowed. I mean returning to user space with
> held mutex and other processes can unlock it. I don't think mutex is
> what you need. Or more importantly is this really an issue?
> 

In a separate call, I and Shakeel agreed on that this is trying to fix an issue
that aren't proved real.  So I will drop this patch in next version of the
patchset.  We can restore this patch or find better fix later if the problem
comes out in real.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park