lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:30:05 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, amitk@...nel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, ionela.voinescu@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote: [ ... ] >>> changed via sysfs. >>> >>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree. >> >> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack. >> >> > > Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs? > Maybe I should drop mine then. Ok let me clarify :) In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I apply the changes or not. I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong. As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon. Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;) -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists