lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:45:13 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power

On 11/26/20 2:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> [ ... ]
>>>> changed via sysfs.
>>>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree.
>>> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack.
>> Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs?
>> Maybe I should drop mine then.
> Ok let me clarify :)
> In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the
> consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented
> before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I
> apply the changes or not.
> I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she
> commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also
> Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong.
> As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are
> no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon.
> Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber
> of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;)

Thank you clarifying this and taking the patches into the testing


Powered by blists - more mailing lists