linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9680cd44-c22e-2f5e-43ec-4a7f16680a45@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:45:13 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, ionela.voinescu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power
 Allocation



On 11/26/20 2:30 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>>>> changed via sysfs.
>>>>
>>>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree.
>>>
>>> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs?
>> Maybe I should drop mine then.
> 
> Ok let me clarify :)
> 
> In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the
> consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented
> before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I
> apply the changes or not.
> 
> I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she
> commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also
> Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong.
> 
> As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are
> no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon.
> 
> Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber
> of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;)
> 

Thank you clarifying this and taking the patches into the testing
branch.

Regards,
Lukasz