lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875z5rk68z.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 01:12:12 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@...d.ro>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote:
> These messages are described as warnings in the MSI code.

Where and what has MSI to do with these messages?

> Spotted because they break quiet boot on a Ryzen 5000 CPU.

They don't break the boot.

The machine boots fine, but having interrupts raised on a vector which
is unused is really bad.

Can you please provide the actual message from dmesg?

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ