lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:50:12 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: vb2: always set buffer cache sync hints

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 1:35 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On (20/11/27 15:56), Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > BTW, wouldn't it be sufficient to change this code to:
> >
> >       if (!q->allow_cache_hints && q->memory != VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF) {
> >               vb->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 1;
> >               vb->need_cache_sync_on_finish = 1;
> >       }
>
> I think it would be sufficient.

Does it matter at this point if allow_cache_hints is set or not?

Best regards,
Tomasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ