[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nBYycRrBFVQE-D8TfsLwFf+xrL=jcRN1cULG=3cexRDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:43:03 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: trix@...hat.com
Cc: Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
nickhu@...estech.com, green.hu@...il.com, deanbo422@...il.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS add D: tag for subsystem commit prefix
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:51 PM <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From
> RFC MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/11/21/190
Please use lore.kernel.org for links.
> The prefix used by subsystems in their commit log is arbitrary.
> To elimitate the time and effort to manually find a reasonable
Typo in "eliminate".
> prefix, store the preferred prefix in the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Populate with reasonable prefixes using this algorithm.
> What did the maintainers use in their commits?
> If there were no maintainers commits then what did everyone
> else use in their commits.
Why is this in the form of a question? I am not sure I understand --
is it rhetorical?
> The results were manually reviewed and about 25% were rejected.
What do you mean by rejected?
> Add 'D' tag to checkpatch.pl
>
> Use 'D' tag by adding --subsystem_commit_prefix option
> get_maintainer.pl
This looks also out of place, as if it was squashed from other
commits. I would suggest trying to reword the message in prose,
explaining the rationale and why it was done like this.
> AUXILIARY DISPLAY DRIVERS
Missing entry for auxdisplay.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists