linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] iio:core: Introduce unlocked version of iio_map_array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b933efbe-133e-bece-5516-2ecf3dc120b0@gmx.de>
Date:   Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:22:16 +0100
From:   Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] iio:core: Introduce unlocked version of
 iio_map_array_unregister()

Hi Jonathan,

On 28.11.20 at 14:54, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> A few notes to make it harder for people to do that in future.
> 1. Don't send patch series (or new versions of older patches) in reply
>    to an existing thread.   They get lost and difficult to pull out.
>    b4 can't automatically figure out which patches to pull from that
>    original thread for example.
> 2. Always version number whole series with same number, even if some patches
>    are new.   So this should be v3.
>

Thanks for these hints, I will keep it in mind for future patch submissions.

Regards,
Lino