[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e0ffe90dc73d45e3e2c3bdd8686aa8e9afa8b23.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:44:31 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, apw@...onical.com, nickhu@...estech.com,
green.hu@...il.com, deanbo422@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS add D: tag for subsystem commit prefix
On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 08:30 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/28/20 8:00 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > On 11/27/20 2:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > []
> > > > I think an exception mechanism would be better than a specific
> > > > mechanism added to various entries.
> > > Can you give an example of what you mean ?
> > Inherit the parent prefix then add the basename(dirname) as a default.
> >
> > For instance, changes to any subsystem of drivers/staging starts as
> > "staging: " and with "$basename(path): " appended.
>
> Ah, this is quite a bit different.
>
> As far as I can tell there is no default.
The idea is to avoid adding a D: entry to each subsystem section.
> MAINTAINERS would only have the exceptions, obviously needing drivers/foo to be 'foo:'
>
> Without the full prefix, the user would be need to use get_maintainer.pl to figure it out.
True. Or some other script.
> Are the ""'s in the D value necessary ?
Maybe not. I did that for clarity with the space after colon.
My recollection is some systems used "[subsystem]" separators
and other use / without space and not colons, but I'm for
whatever approriate changes that support standarization
I think most developer/maintainers don't care one way or
another about patch commit prefixes, but those that do care
seem to care a lot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists