lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X8IVJcp1gRE+FJCJ@xps-13-7390>
Date:   Sat, 28 Nov 2020 10:15:17 +0100
From:   Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer: set the right timestamp in the slow path of
 __rb_reserve_next()

In the slow path of __rb_reserve_next() a nested event(s) can happen
between evaluating the timestamp delta of the current event and updating
write_stamp via local_cmpxchg(); in this case the delta is not valid
anymore and it should be set to 0 (same timestamp as the interrupting
event), since the event that we are currently processing is not the last
event in the buffer.

Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/831207
Fixes: a389d86f7fd0 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index dc83b3fa9fe7..5e30e0cdb6ce 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -3287,11 +3287,11 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 		ts = rb_time_stamp(cpu_buffer->buffer);
 		barrier();
  /*E*/		if (write == (local_read(&tail_page->write) & RB_WRITE_MASK) &&
-		    info->after < ts) {
+		    info->after < ts &&
+		    rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp,
+				    info->after, info->ts)) {
 			/* Nothing came after this event between C and E */
 			info->delta = ts - info->after;
-			(void)rb_time_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->write_stamp,
-					      info->after, info->ts);
 			info->ts = ts;
 		} else {
 			/*
-- 
2.29.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ