lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:19:21 +0100
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Remove 'running from the wrong CPU' warning

It's guaranteed that no request is in flight when a hctx is going
offline. This warning is only triggered when the wq's CPU is hot
plugged and the blk-mq is not synced up yet.

As this state is temporary and the request is still processed
correctly, better remove the warning as this is the fast path.

Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
---

v2:
  - remove the warning as suggested by Ming
v1:
  - initial version
    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20201126095152.19151-1-dwagner@suse.de/

 block/blk-mq.c | 25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 55bcee5dc032..7e6761804f86 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1495,31 +1495,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	int srcu_idx;
 
-	/*
-	 * We should be running this queue from one of the CPUs that
-	 * are mapped to it.
-	 *
-	 * There are at least two related races now between setting
-	 * hctx->next_cpu from blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() and running
-	 * __blk_mq_run_hw_queue():
-	 *
-	 * - hctx->next_cpu is found offline in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
-	 *   but later it becomes online, then this warning is harmless
-	 *   at all
-	 *
-	 * - hctx->next_cpu is found online in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
-	 *   but later it becomes offline, then the warning can't be
-	 *   triggered, and we depend on blk-mq timeout handler to
-	 *   handle dispatched requests to this hctx
-	 */
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
-		cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
-			raw_smp_processor_id(),
-			cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
-		dump_stack();
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
 	 * we catch bad users of this early.
-- 
2.16.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ