[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X8TzY0rotaSZ2FYv@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:28:03 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_acl.h: define missing ACL functions on
non-posix-acl build
Hi,
On (20/11/30 14:09), Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
> Sergey, what actual problem is your patch trying to solve? It sounds
> like this is either theoretical and pointless, or you're trying to
> build an external module that uses POSIX ACL functions that shouldn't
> be needed when CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL is disabled.
It's an external module, that OpenWRT folks build with !FS_POSIX_ACL.
It compiles just fine, but modprobe fails because there are several
exported ACL symbols that don't provide dummy definitions (which the
module in question didn't guard with ifdef-s).
> In the latter case, the external module will just end up including dead
> code, so the module should be fixed instead.
ifdef-s work. But since posix_acl.h already provides some dummy
definitions for exported symbols, I thought that that list can
be extended (become complete).
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists