| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c96f60f4-f525-2957-6a8a-ae9e3288b04a@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:00:44 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_acl.h: define missing ACL functions on
non-posix-acl build
On 11/29/20 7:37 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> A quick question, shouldn't there be dummy definitions for
> the EXPORT_SYMBOL-s? So that external modules can be modprobed
> and used.
>
> Some of posix_acl exported symbols have dummy definitions,
> others don't.
>
> E.g. posix_acl_create() is exported symbol and it's defined for
> both FS_POSIX_ACL and !FS_POSIX_ACL. While exported set_posix_acl()
> is defined only for FS_POSIX_ACL config.
Hi,
Currently CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL differences seem to be handled in
each source file as needed:
fs/inode.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
fs/inode.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
fs/namei.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
fs/overlayfs/dir.c: if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL) || !acl)
fs/overlayfs/inode.c: if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL) || !IS_POSIXACL(realinode))
fs/overlayfs/inode.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
fs/overlayfs/super.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
fs/xattr.c:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
include/linux/evm.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
include/linux/fs.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
include/linux/posix_acl.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
include/linux/posix_acl.h:#endif /* CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL */
include/linux/posix_acl_xattr.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
However, I have no objection to your patch.
I am adding Andreas & Al for their viewpoints.
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/posix_acl.h b/include/linux/posix_acl.h
> index 90797f1b421d..8a6c77a69761 100644
> --- a/include/linux/posix_acl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/posix_acl.h
> @@ -59,19 +59,19 @@ posix_acl_release(struct posix_acl *acl)
>
> /* posix_acl.c */
>
> +extern int posix_acl_permission(struct inode *, const struct posix_acl *, int);
> +
> +extern struct posix_acl *get_posix_acl(struct inode *, int);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> extern void posix_acl_init(struct posix_acl *, int);
> extern struct posix_acl *posix_acl_alloc(int, gfp_t);
> -extern int posix_acl_valid(struct user_namespace *, const struct posix_acl *);
> -extern int posix_acl_permission(struct inode *, const struct posix_acl *, int);
> -extern struct posix_acl *posix_acl_from_mode(umode_t, gfp_t);
> extern int posix_acl_equiv_mode(const struct posix_acl *, umode_t *);
> +extern struct posix_acl *posix_acl_from_mode(umode_t, gfp_t);
> extern int __posix_acl_create(struct posix_acl **, gfp_t, umode_t *);
> extern int __posix_acl_chmod(struct posix_acl **, gfp_t, umode_t);
> -
> -extern struct posix_acl *get_posix_acl(struct inode *, int);
> extern int set_posix_acl(struct inode *, int, struct posix_acl *);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> +extern int posix_acl_valid(struct user_namespace *, const struct posix_acl *);
> extern int posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *, umode_t);
> extern int posix_acl_create(struct inode *, umode_t *, struct posix_acl **,
> struct posix_acl **);
> @@ -91,18 +91,61 @@ static inline void cache_no_acl(struct inode *inode)
> inode->i_acl = NULL;
> inode->i_default_acl = NULL;
> }
> +
> +struct posix_acl *get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type);
> #else
> +static inline void posix_acl_init(struct posix_acl *, int)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct posix_acl *posix_acl_alloc(int, gfp_t)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int posix_acl_valid(struct user_namespace *,
> + const struct posix_acl *)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int posix_acl_equiv_mode(const struct posix_acl *, umode_t *)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct posix_acl *posix_acl_from_mode(umode_t, gfp_t)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline int posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int set_posix_acl(struct inode *, int, struct posix_acl *)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define simple_set_acl NULL
>
> static inline int simple_acl_create(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static inline int __posix_acl_create(struct posix_acl **, gfp_t, umode_t *)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __posix_acl_chmod(struct posix_acl **, gfp_t, umode_t)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline void cache_no_acl(struct inode *inode)
> {
> }
> @@ -117,8 +160,38 @@ static inline int posix_acl_create(struct inode *inode, umode_t *mode,
> static inline void forget_all_cached_acls(struct inode *inode)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline struct posix_acl *get_cached_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct posix_acl *get_cached_acl_rcu(struct inode *inode,
> + int type)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_cached_acl(struct inode *inode, int type,
> + struct posix_acl *acl)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void forget_cached_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct posix_acl *get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int posix_acl_update_mode(struct inode *, umode_t *,
> + struct posix_acl **)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL */
>
> -struct posix_acl *get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_POSIX_ACL_H */
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists