[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pn3tfnbp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:28:10 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, maz@...nel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, dwagner@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] genirq/affinity: Add irq_update_affinity_desc()
On Tue, Dec 01 2020 at 15:22, John Garry wrote:
> /*
> * There are certain limitations on when it may be used - attempts to
> use it for when the kernel is configured for generic IRQ reservation
> mode (in config GENERIC_IRQ_RESERVATION_MODE) will fail, as it may
> conflict with managed/non-managed interrupt accounting. In addition,
> attempts to use it on an interrupt which is already started or which has
> already been configured as managed will also fail, as these mean invalid
> init state or double init.
>
> ...
>
> Let me know if not good, if not I'll post again soon.
LGTM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists