lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:09:47 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     shuo.a.liu@...el.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Yu Wang <yu1.wang@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] virt: acrn: Introduce VM management interfaces

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 05:38:41PM +0800, shuo.a.liu@...el.com wrote:
> +		vm_param->reserved0 = 0;
> +		vm_param->reserved1 = 0;

NO!

This means that userspace can put whatever crud they want in those
fields, and you will happily zero it out.  Then, when those reserved
fields are wanted to be used in the future, you will take those values
from userspace and accept them as a valid value.  But, since userspace
was sending crud before, now you will take that crud and do something
with it.

TEST IT to verify that it is zero, that way userspace gets it right the
first time, and you don't get it wrong later, as you can not change it
later.

thaqnks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ