| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:50:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] power: supply: max8997_charger: Set CHARGER current
limit
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:07:19PM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
> Register for extcon notification and set charging current depending on
> the detected cable type. Current values are taken from i9100 kernel
> fork.
>
> Enable and disable the CHARGER regulator based on extcon events and
> remove regulator-always-on from the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@...tonmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts | 1 -
> drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> index 6d0c04d77a39..9f8d927e0d21 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ charger_reg: CHARGER {
> regulator-name = "CHARGER";
> regulator-min-microamp = <60000>;
> regulator-max-microamp = <2580000>;
> - regulator-always-on;
Thanks for the patch.
The DTS changes always go separately.
> };
>
> chargercv_reg: CHARGER_CV {
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c
> index 1947af25879a..26cd271576ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> // MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/extcon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -31,6 +32,12 @@ struct charger_data {
> struct device *dev;
> struct max8997_dev *iodev;
> struct power_supply *battery;
> + struct regulator *reg;
You need to include regulator consumer.h.
> + struct {
It makes all dereferences longer. Just add a comment that these are
related to the extcon.
> + struct extcon_dev *edev;
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> + struct work_struct work;
> + } extcon;
> };
>
> static enum power_supply_property max8997_battery_props[] = {
> @@ -88,6 +95,63 @@ static int max8997_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void max8997_battery_extcon_evt_stop_work(void *data)
> +{
> + struct charger_data *charger = data;
> +
> + cancel_work_sync(&charger->extcon.work);
> +}
> +
> +static void max8997_battery_extcon_evt_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct charger_data *charger =
> + container_of(work, struct charger_data, extcon.work);
> + int ret, current_limit;
> + struct extcon_dev *edev = charger->extcon.edev;
> +
It would be useful to report the current with POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_* but
it is a different patch.
> + if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP) > 0) {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB SDP charger is connected\n");
> + current_limit = 450000;
> + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP) > 0) {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB DCP charger is connected\n");
> + current_limit = 650000;
> + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_FAST) > 0) {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB FAST charger is connected\n");
> + current_limit = 650000;
> + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_SLOW) > 0) {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB SLOW charger is connected\n");
> + current_limit = 650000;
The charger provides 500 mA, so I wonder whether 650 here is correct. Is
it at different voltage?
> + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP) > 0) {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB CDP charger is connected\n");
> + current_limit = 650000;
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB charger is diconnected\n");
> + current_limit = -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (current_limit > 0) {
ret should be declared here.
> + ret = regulator_set_current_limit(charger->reg, current_limit, current_limit);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to set current limit: %d\n", ret);
Failure of setting the current should rather disable the charging.
> + ret = regulator_enable(charger->reg);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to enable regulator: %d\n", ret);
> + } else {
ret should be declared here.
> + ret = regulator_disable(charger->reg);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to disable regulator: %d\n", ret);
> + }
What about top-off charging?
> +}
> +
> +static int max8997_battery_extcon_evt(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long event, void *param)
> +{
> + struct charger_data *charger =
> + container_of(nb, struct charger_data, extcon.nb);
> + schedule_work(&charger->extcon.work);
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> static const struct power_supply_desc max8997_battery_desc = {
> .name = "max8997_pmic",
> .type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY,
> @@ -104,6 +168,7 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct i2c_client *i2c = iodev->i2c;
> struct max8997_platform_data *pdata = iodev->pdata;
> struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = {};
> + struct extcon_dev *edev;
>
> if (!pdata) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data supplied.\n");
> @@ -151,6 +216,12 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev("max8997-muic");
Store it directly under charger->edev.
> + if (edev == NULL) {
if (!edev) {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "extcon is not ready, probe deferred\n");
Do not print anything on deferrals.
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> +
> charger = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*charger), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!charger)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -170,6 +241,27 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(charger->battery);
> }
>
> + charger->reg = regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "CHARGER");
Here and in extcon_get_extcon_dev() - you make all these devices tightly
coupled. It will work, but I am afraid it's easy to break later.
Instead you should have a device node in DTS to which the charger could
bind and where the driver will find regulator supply and extcon
phandles (with extcon_get_edev_by_phandle() for example).
> + if (IS_ERR(charger->reg)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get CHARGER regulator\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(charger->reg);
> + }
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&charger->extcon.work, max8997_battery_extcon_evt_worker);
> + ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, max8997_battery_extcon_evt_stop_work, charger);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add extcon evt stop action: %d\n", ret);
Missing regulator_put() here and in other places. Use devm-().
> + return ret;
> + }
> + charger->extcon.edev = edev;
> + charger->extcon.nb.notifier_call = max8997_battery_extcon_evt;
> + ret = devm_extcon_register_notifier_all(&pdev->dev, charger->extcon.edev,
> + &charger->extcon.nb);
Align the arguments with opening '('.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists