[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202063657.GC1363814@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 22:36:57 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Paul Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>, kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] perf metric: Don't compute unused events.
> +| expr '-' expr
> +{
> + if (!compute_ids || (is_const($1.val) && is_const($3.val))) {
> + assert($1.ids == NULL);
> + assert($3.ids == NULL);
> + $$.val = $1.val - $3.val;
> + $$.ids = NULL;
> + } else {
> + /* LHS and/or RHS need computing from event IDs so union. */
> + $$ = union_expr($1, $3);
> + }
Can't this be all in a macro? It's still a lot of duplication.
I'm still not a fan, but I think with a macro it wouldn't be too bad.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists