linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] i2c: iproc: handle master read request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201202143505.GA874@kunai>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:35:05 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lori Hikichi <lori.hikichi@...adcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] i2c: iproc: handle master read request


> All review comments are scattered now, please let me know what has to be
> done further,
> Are we going to change the tasklet to irq thread ?
> Are we going to remove batching 64 packets if transaction > 64B and use rx
> fifo threshold ?
> 
> I don't see any issue with current code but if it has to change we need a
> valid reason for the same.
> If nothing to be done, please acknowledge the patch.

Valid request. Has there been any news?