[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <585009b4-537e-0fc9-ea4a-79210c96a514@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 07:56:49 -0800
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/26] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW
On 12/3/2020 7:12 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/3/20 1:19 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:21:51AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>>> Before introducing _PAGE_COW for non-hardware memory management purposes in
>>> the next patch, rename _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW and _PAGE_BIT_DIRTY to
>>> _PAGE_BIT_DIRTY_HW to make meanings more clear. There are no functional
>>> changes from this patch.
>> There's no guarantee for "next" or "this" patch when a patch gets
>> applied so reword your commit message pls.
>>
>> Also, I fail to understand here what _PAGE_DIRTY_HW makes more clear?
>> The page dirty bit is clear enough to me so why the churn?
>
> Once upon a time in this set, we had:
>
> _PAGE_DIRTY (the old hardware bit)
> and
> _PAGE_DIRTY_SW (the new shadow stack necessitated bit)
>
> In *that* case, it made sense to change the name of the hardware one to
> help differentiate them. But, over time, we changed _PAGE_DIRTY_SW to
> _PAGE_COW.
>
> I think you're right. The renaming is just churn now with the current
> naming.
>
Ok, I will drop this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists