[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9edd473b8bfc576b8b274c64fd74d021bc4f4d0.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:45:34 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: fix -Wformat
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 06:39 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> I agree if it can be done in checkpatch it should.
> It is good to have multiple passes on cleaning.
true
> checkpatch is best at fixing new problems,
> clang-tidy-fix is best at fixing old problems.
checkpatch is a set of brainless regexes that operates on
incomplete information. It's not a real parser nor compiler.
It's really only useful as a way to avoid trivial style issues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists