[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2579b090abb447aa4b0773ba6c91df0f6e84eb6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:43:01 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
"mjg59@...gle.com" <mjg59@...gle.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] ima: Move ima_reset_appraise_flags() call to
post hooks
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 11:56 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 10:23 AM
> > ima_inode_setxattr() and ima_inode_removexattr() hooks are called
> > before an
> > operation is performed. Thus, ima_reset_appraise_flags() should not be
> > called there, as flags might be unnecessarily reset if the operation is
> > denied.
> >
> > This patch introduces the post hooks ima_inode_post_setxattr() and
> > ima_inode_post_removexattr(), removes ima_inode_removexattr() and
> > adds the
> > call to ima_reset_appraise_flags() in the new functions.
>
> Removing ima_inode_removexattr() is not correct. We should still prevent
> that security.ima is removed when CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not set. I will fix
> this in the next version.
Ok. So this patch will define the post hooks and defer
ima_reset_appraise_flags() to them, leaving the original hooks intact.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists