linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the at91 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:43:32 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the at91 tree

On 04/12/2020 07:23:32+1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   d45879c1307f ("ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: remove bypass property")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: 720329e86a463 ("ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: add device tree for soc and board")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant:
> 
> Fixes: 1e5f532c2737 ("ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: add device tree for soc and board")
> 

This is correct and checkpatch didn't complain because I actually have
that commit in my tree. This is unfortunate but I'll fix that. Thank you
for the information.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com