Message-ID: <1315e36e-44f1-d753-935e-b6fbe71756e3@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:20:11 +0800
From:   ivanhu <ivan.hu@...onical.com>
To:     Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        fwts-devel@...ts.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] efi/efi_test: read RuntimeServicesSupported



On 12/2/20 7:38 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/30/20 11:38 AM, ivanhu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/30/20 5:17 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 11/30/20 9:16 AM, ivanhu wrote:
>>>> Hi Heinrich,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>>> It looks good to me, but I noticed that the runtime_supported_mask was
>>>> introduced after 5.7-rc1.
>>>> Maybe we should add the kernel version checking for the old kernels.
>>>
>>> This is a kernel patch. Why should we check the kernel version in the
>>> kernel code?
>>>
>>> As patches may be back-ported we should not make any assumptions in fwts
>>> based on the kernel version. If the ioctl() call fails with errno =
>>> ENOTTY, we know that the kernel does not implement the ioctl call and we
>>> have to assume that all runtime services are available.
>>
>> Sounds good to me,
>> Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@...onical.com>
>>
>> And I will replace the reading RuntimeServicesSupported efi variable by
>> using efi_test in fwts RuntimeServicesSupported tests.
>>
>> FWTS will still test those Unsupported Runtime services to check if it
>> returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED correctly.
>> Is that could solve your problem?
>> If I remember correctly, the problem from you is not to test those
>> marked Unsupported Runtime services. But from the Spec. 8.1 Runtime
>> Services Rules and Restrictions,
> 
> The problem I reported was that it is impossible to test UEFI runtime
> services on U-Boot because FWTS tries to read the non-existent
> RuntimeServicesSupported UEFI variable and mistakenly assumes that if
> the variable does not exist none of the runtime services is implemented.

Could you provide the result log for me to check?

Ivan
> 
> The correct thing to do in FWTS is:
> 
> * read RuntimeServicesSupported via the ioctl
> * if the ioctl fails assume that all runtime services
>   are implemented
> * if the ioctl fails with errno != ENOTTY write an error message
> * for each runtime service marked as not supported
>   check that it returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED
> * for each service marked as supported
>   check that it works correctly
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
>> "
>> Note that this is merely a hint to the OS, which it is free to ignore,
>> and so the platform is still required to provide callable
>> implementations of unsupported runtime services that simply return
>> EFI_UNSUPPORTED.
>> "
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ivan
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Heinrich
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>> On 11/28/20 3:20 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>> Since the UEFI 2.8A specification the UEFI enabled firmware provides a
>>>>> configuration table EFI_RT_PROPERTIES_TABLE which indicates which
>>>>> runtime
>>>>> services are enabled. The EFI stub reads this table and saves the
>>>>> value of
>>>>> the field RuntimeServicesSupported internally.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Firmware Test Suite requires the value to determine if UEFI
>>>>> runtime
>>>>> services are correctly implemented.
>>>>>
>>>>> With this patch an IOCTL call is provided to read the value of the
>>>>> field
>>>>> RuntimeServicesSupported, e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>>       #define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>>>>               _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>>>>       unsigned int mask;
>>>>>       fd = open("/dev/efi_test", O_RDWR);
>>>>>       ret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK, &mask);
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h |  3 +++
>>>>>    2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>>> b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>>> index ddf9eae396fe..47d67bb0a516 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>>> @@ -663,6 +663,19 @@ static long
>>>>> efi_runtime_query_capsulecaps(unsigned long arg)
>>>>>        return rv;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static long efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(unsigned long arg)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    unsigned int __user *supported_mask;
>>>>> +    int rv = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    supported_mask = (unsigned int *)arg;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (put_user(efi.runtime_supported_mask, supported_mask))
>>>>> +        rv = -EFAULT;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    return rv;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>    static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>>>>                                unsigned long arg)
>>>>>    {
>>>>> @@ -699,6 +712,9 @@ static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file,
>>>>> unsigned int cmd,
>>>>>
>>>>>        case EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM:
>>>>>            return efi_runtime_reset_system(arg);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    case EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK:
>>>>> +        return efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(arg);
>>>>>        }
>>>>>
>>>>>        return -ENOTTY;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>>> b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>>> index f2446aa1c2e3..117349e57993 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>>> @@ -118,4 +118,7 @@ struct efi_resetsystem {
>>>>>    #define EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM \
>>>>>        _IOW('p', 0x0B, struct efi_resetsystem)
>>>>>
>>>>> +#define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>>>> +    _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>>>> +
>>>>>    #endif /* _DRIVERS_FIRMWARE_EFI_TEST_H_ */
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.29.2
>>>>>
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists