lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201207142556.2045481-5-andrew@aj.id.au>
Date:   Tue,  8 Dec 2020 00:55:54 +1030
From:   Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, joel@....id.au,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, ryan_chen@...eedtech.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add KUnit tests for phase calculations

Converting degrees of phase to logic delays is irritating to test on
hardware, so lets exercise the function using KUnit.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig                |  14 ++++
 drivers/mmc/host/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
index 596f32637315..9f910655d6ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
@@ -168,6 +168,20 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED_TEST
+	bool "Test for the ASPEED SDHCI controller"
+	depends on MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED && KUNIT
+	help
+	  Enable KUnit tests for the ASPEED SDHCI driver. Select this
+	  option only if you will boot the kernel for the purpose of running
+	  unit tests (e.g. under UML or qemu).
+
+	  The KUnit tests generally exercise parts of the driver that do not
+	  directly touch the hardware, for example, the phase correction
+	  calculations.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config MMC_SDHCI_OF_AT91
 	tristate "SDHCI OF support for the Atmel SDMMC controller"
 	depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
index 451c25fc2c69..3ee59d5802cf 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_DOVE)		+= sdhci-dove.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA)		+= sdhci-tegra.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ARASAN)	+= sdhci-of-arasan.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED)	+= sdhci-of-aspeed.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED_TEST)	+= sdhci-of-aspeed-test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_AT91)		+= sdhci-of-at91.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ESDHC)	+= sdhci-of-esdhc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_HLWD)		+= sdhci-of-hlwd.o
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fb79b278fb81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/* Copyright (C) 2020 IBM Corp. */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include "sdhci-of-aspeed.c"
+
+static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int rate = 52000000;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 0));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 1));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 3));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 4));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 5));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 14,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 23));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 24));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));
+}
+
+static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int rate = 200000000;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 0));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 5));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 6));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 7));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 14,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 89));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 90));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 91));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case aspeed_sdhci_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52),
+	KUNIT_CASE(aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite aspeed_sdhci_test_suite = {
+	.name = "sdhci-of-aspeed",
+	.test_cases = aspeed_sdhci_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(aspeed_sdhci_test_suite);
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ