[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rg0cajt.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:22:46 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, guoren@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fixed kernel test robot warning
On Dez 09 2020, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:21 AM Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Dez 09 2020, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>>
>> > Kernel test robot throws below warning -
>> >
>> > arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c:14:6: warning: no previous prototype
>> > for 'asm_offsets' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> > 14 | void asm_offsets(void)
>> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> >
>> > This patch should fixed it.
>>
>> Or rename it to main, like most other asm-offsets files.
>
> Few asm-offsets files named it as foo(). Does a rename to main() will
> work straight forward ?
Calling it main will suppress the warning, but other than that it is
completely irrelevant how you call it.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists