linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] net: batman-adv: remove unneeded MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:48:56 +0100
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To:     Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
        sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc, marcel@...tmann.org,
        johan.hedberg@...il.com, roopa@...dia.com, nikolay@...dia.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        jmaloy@...hat.com, ying.xue@...driver.com, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kpsingh@...omium.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] net: batman-adv: remove unneeded MODULE_VERSION()
 usage

On 05.12.20 08:06, Sven Eckelmann wrote:

Hi,

> Is there some explanation besides an opinion? Some kind goal which you want to 
> achieve with it maybe?

Just a cleanup. I've been under the impression that this version is just
an relic from oot times.

> At least for us it was an easy way to query the release cycle information via 
> batctl. Which made it easier for us to roughly figure out what an reporter/
> inquirer was using - independent of whether he is using the in-kernel version 
> or a backported version.

Is the OOT scenario still valid ?

> Loosing this source of information and breaking parts of batctl and other 
> tools (respondd, ...) is not the end of the world. But I would at least know 
> why this is now necessary.

Okay, if this particular information indeed has a practical value, we
should keep it. Taking it as a NAK.

Perhaps we should add a comment what it's used for and make sure, the
version number is properly maintained.

The problem I see w/ those version fields is that we have lots of
changes in the kernel tree, w/o the version number being increased -
making this information at least doubtful.


--mtx

-- 
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287