[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201208143324.GB2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:33:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC lockdep 4/4] lockdep/selftest: Add wait context selftests
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 06:31:12PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> These tests are added for two purposes:
>
> * Test the implementation of wait context checks and related
> annotations.
>
> * Semi-document the rules for wait context nesting when
> PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y.
Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst should have that.
> The test cases are only avaible for PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y, as wait
> context checking makes more sense for that configuration.
Looks about right ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists