| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87o8j4qshl.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 20:01:34 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, npiggin@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy
search_exception_tables() verification
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> writes:
> Le 08/12/2020 à 14:00, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
>> On 12/8/20 2:07 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> search_exception_tables() is an heavy operation, we have to avoid it.
>>> When KUAP is selected, we'll know the fault has been blocked by KUAP.
>>> Otherwise, it behaves just as if the address was already in the TLBs
>>> and no fault was generated.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>>> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> v3: rebased
>>> v2: Squashed with the preceeding patch which was re-ordering tests that get removed in this patch.
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 23 +++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>>> index 3fcd34c28e10..1770b41e4730 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
>>> @@ -210,28 +210,19 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> - if (!is_exec && address < TASK_SIZE && (error_code & (DSISR_PROTFAULT | DSISR_KEYFAULT)) &&
>>> - !search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) {
>>> - pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to access user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid:
>>> %d)\n",
>>> - address,
>>> - from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()));
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> // Kernel fault on kernel address is bad
>>> if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
>>> return true;
>>> - // Fault on user outside of certain regions (eg. copy_tofrom_user()) is bad
>>> - if (!search_exception_tables(regs->nip))
>>> - return true;
>>> -
>>> - // Read/write fault in a valid region (the exception table search passed
>>> - // above), but blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed.
>>> - if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write))
>>> + // Read/write fault blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed.
>>> + if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) {
>>> + pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to %s user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n",
>>> + is_write ? "write" : "read", address,
>>> + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()));
>>> return true;
>>> + }
>>
>>
>> Should we update bad_kuap_fault to check for !is_kernel_addr() and error_code & (DSISIR_PROT_FAULT |
>> DSISIR_KEYFAULT). I am wondering whether we can take another fault w.r.t kernel address/user address
>> and end up reporting that as KUAP fault?
>
> Just before this we do:
>
> if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
> return true;
>
> About the error code, I don't know. Can we take a fault that is not a DSISR_PROT_FAULT |
> DSISR_KEYFAULT and that is not a KUAP fault ?
>
> Previously (before this patch), the error code was taken into account for the call to
> search_exception_tables(), but has never been for the bad_kuap_fault().
>
a KUAP fault on radix will result in PROTFAULT and on hash it will
generate KEYFAULT. ie, something like below
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/kup.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/kup.h
index 32fd4452e960..b18cd931e325 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/kup.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/kup.h
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static inline void restore_user_access(unsigned long flags)
allow_user_access(to, to, end - addr, KUAP_READ_WRITE);
}
-static inline bool
-bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, bool is_write)
+static inline bool bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
+ bool is_write, unsigned long error_code)
{
unsigned long begin = regs->kuap & 0xf0000000;
unsigned long end = regs->kuap << 28;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
index 91af50e9b09a..16bb6aee9fcd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup.h
@@ -392,14 +392,24 @@ static inline void set_kuap(unsigned long value)
}
static inline bool bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
- bool is_write)
+ bool is_write, unsigned long error_code)
{
+ unsigned long fault;
+
if (!mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_BOOK3S_KUAP))
return false;
+
+ if (radix_enabled())
+ fault = DSISR_PROTFAULT;
+ else
+ fault = DSISR_KEYFAULT;
+
/*
* For radix this will be a storage protection fault (DSISR_PROTFAULT).
* For hash this will be a key fault (DSISR_KEYFAULT)
*/
+ if (!(error_code & fault))
+ return false;
/*
* We do have exception table entry, but accessing the
* userspace results in fault. This could be because we
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h
index 49fe4b4a9434..bdffa2664bf0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ void setup_kuap(bool disabled);
#else
static inline void setup_kuap(bool disabled) { }
-static inline bool
-bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, bool is_write)
+static inline bool bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
+ bool is_write, unsigned long error_code)
{
return false;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/kup-8xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/kup-8xx.h
index 567cdc557402..7bdd9e5b63ed 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/kup-8xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/kup-8xx.h
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static inline void restore_user_access(unsigned long flags)
mtspr(SPRN_MD_AP, flags);
}
-static inline bool
-bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, bool is_write)
+static inline bool bad_kuap_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
+ bool is_write, unsigned long error_code)
{
return WARN(!((regs->kuap ^ MD_APG_KUAP) & 0xff000000),
"Bug: fault blocked by AP register !");
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
index b12595102525..03c3414bdc79 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
}
// Kernel fault on kernel address is bad
- if (address >= TASK_SIZE)
+ if (is_kernel_addr(address))
return true;
// Fault on user outside of certain regions (eg. copy_tofrom_user()) is bad
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
// Read/write fault in a valid region (the exception table search passed
// above), but blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed.
- if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write))
+ if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write, error_code))
return true;
// What's left? Kernel fault on user in well defined regions (extable
Powered by blists - more mailing lists