linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow architectures to request 'old' entries when prefaulting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:58:12 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow architectures to request 'old' entries when prefaulting

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:40 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> @@ -3978,8 +3994,17 @@ static vm_fault_t do_fault_around(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>
>         /* check if the page fault is solved */
>         vmf->pte -= (vmf->address >> PAGE_SHIFT) - (address >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -       if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
> -               ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> +       if (pte_none(*vmf->pte))
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
> +       if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_PREFAULT_OLD) {
> +               pte_t pte = pte_mkyoung(*vmf->pte);
> +               if (ptep_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, address, vmf->pte, pte, 0))
> +                       update_mmu_cache(vmf->vma, address, vmf->pte);
> +       }

Oh, please dear God no.

First you incorrectly set it old, and then you conditionally make it
young again and as a result force an atomic rwm update and another TLB
flush for no good reason.

Just make sure that the FAULT_FLAG_PREFAULT_OLD never sets the
*actual* address to old.

And yes, that probably means that you need to change "alloc_set_pte()"
to actually pass in the real address, and leave "vmf->address" alone -
so that it can know which ones are prefaulted and which one is real,
but that sounds like a good idea anyway.

Then you can just make alloc_set_pte() do the right thing in the first
place, instead of doing this nasty "lets do it wrong and fix it up
later" horror.

                Linus