linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 sl-b 1/5] mm: Add mem_dump_obj() to print source of memory block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:59:16 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, andrii@...nel.org,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 sl-b 1/5] mm: Add mem_dump_obj() to print source of
 memory block

On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 05:53:06PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:57:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:17:10AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Your two new exports don't actually seem to get used in modular code
> > > at all in this series.
> > 
> > Indeed, and I either need to remove the exports or make my test code in
> > kernel/rcu/rcuscale.o suitable for upstreaming.  Or find the appropriate
> > mm/slab selftest location.
> 
> I'd rather not export something like this which pokes deep into
> internals.  That being said I've been working on off on a
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR() that just exports a symbol to one specific module.
> Hopefully I'll finish it for the next merge window, and with that
> I'd feel much more comfortable with an export.

That would be really useful!  I have a number of symbols that should
only be used by a few specific in-tree modules, independent of this
patch series.

For my part, I will see if there is a good mm-related location for this
sort of selftest.

							Thanx, Paul