| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:17:42 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@...onical.com>,
Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
CC: linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>,
"khalid.elmously@...onical.com" <khalid.elmously@...onical.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Recent raid10 block discard patchset causes filesystem
corruption on fstrim
Hi Matthew,
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 7:46 PM, Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently backported the following patches into the Ubuntu stable kernels:
>
> md: add md_submit_discard_bio() for submitting discard bio
> md/raid10: extend r10bio devs to raid disks
> md/raid10: pull codes that wait for blocked dev into one function
> md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request
> md/raid10: improve discard request for far layout
> dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10
> dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10
Thanks for the report!
Hi Xiao,
Could you please take a look at this and let me know soon? We need to fix
this before 5.10 official release.
Thanks,
Song
>
> and this morning, a user reported the following downstream bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1907262/
>
> Their weekly cronjob that runs fstrim had run, and their raid10 array has
> extensive data corruption.
>
> The issue is reproducible on the latest 5.10-rc7 mainline kernel, steps are
> below.
>
> I used a m5d.4xlarge instance on AWS to ultilise 2x 300GB SSDs that support
> block discard. You will want to select small disks to lower the time needed
> to reproduce.
>
> $ uname -rv
> 5.10.0-rc7+ #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 01:15:27 UTC 2020
>
> Create a raid10 array, with LVM:
>
> $ lsblk
> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
> nvme0n1 259:0 0 8G 0 disk
> └─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 8G 0 part /
> nvme1n1 259:2 0 279.4G 0 disk
> nvme2n1 259:3 0 279.4G 0 disk
>
> $ sudo -s
> # mdadm -C -v -l10 -n2 -N "lv-raid" -R /dev/md0 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1
> mdadm: layout defaults to n2
> mdadm: layout defaults to n2
> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K
> mdadm: size set to 292836352K
> mdadm: automatically enabling write-intent bitmap on large array
> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata
> mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.
> # pvcreate -ff -y /dev/md0
> Physical volume "/dev/md0" successfully created.
> # vgcreate -f -y VolGroup /dev/md0
> Volume group "VolGroup" successfully created
> # lvcreate -n root -L 100G -ay -y VolGroup
> Logical volume "root" created.
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/VolGroup/root
> mke2fs 1.44.1 (24-Mar-2018)
> Discarding device blocks: done
> Creating filesystem with 26214400 4k blocks and 6553600 inodes
> Filesystem UUID: d7be2e14-fa4d-4489-884b-3bef63b1e1db
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
> 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872
>
> Allocating group tables: done
> Writing inode tables: done
> Creating journal (131072 blocks): done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
> # mount /dev/VolGroup/root /mnt
>
> Next, wait for the disk check to complete, 25 minutes on m5d.4xlarge instance.
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme2n1[1] nvme1n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> [==>..................] resync = 12.0% (35211392/292836352) finish=21.4min speed=200340K/sec
> bitmap: 3/3 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 76918016
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme2n1[1] nvme1n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 0/3 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 582330240
>
> Now that the check is complete, create a file, sync and delete it:
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data.raw bs=4K count=1M
> 1048576+0 records in
> 1048576+0 records out
> 4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 3.95974 s, 1.1 GB/s
> # sync
> # rm /mnt/data.raw
>
> Perform a check:
>
> # echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
>
> Again, wait 25 minutes for it to complete:
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme1n1[1] nvme2n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> [==>..................] check = 13.7% (40356224/292836352) finish=20.8min speed=201707K/sec
> bitmap: 0/3 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 1469696
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme1n1[1] nvme2n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 0/3 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 1469696
>
> Now, perform the fstrim:
>
> # fstrim /mnt --verbose
> /mnt: 97.9 GiB (105089236992 bytes) trimmed
>
> Go for another check:
>
> # echo check >/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme1n1[1] nvme2n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> [========>............] check = 40.3% (118270848/292836352) finish=14.4min speed=200963K/sec
> bitmap: 0/3 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 205324928
>
> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
> md0 : active raid10 nvme1n1[1] nvme2n1[0]
> 292836352 blocks super 1.2 2 near-copies [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 0/3 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> # cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
> 205324928
>
> Now, we need to take the raid10 array down, and perform a fsck on one disk at
> a time:
>
> # umount /mnt
> # vgchange -a n /dev/VolGroup
> 0 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup" now active
> # mdadm --stop /dev/md0
> mdadm: stopped /dev/md0
>
> Let's do first disk;
>
> # mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/nvme1n1
> mdadm: /dev/md1 assembled from 1 drive - need all 2 to start it (use --run to insist).
> # mdadm --run /dev/md127
> mdadm: started array /dev/md/lv-raid
> # vgchange -a y /dev/VolGroup
> 1 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup" now active
> # fsck.ext4 -n -f /dev/VolGroup/root
> e2fsck 1.44.1 (24-Mar-2018)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> /dev/VolGroup/root: 11/6553600 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 557848/26214400 blocks
> # vgchange -a n /dev/VolGroup
> 0 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup" now active
> # mdadm --stop /dev/md127
> mdadm: stopped /dev/md127
>
> The second disk:
>
> # mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/nvme2n1
> mdadm: /dev/md1 assembled from 1 drive - need all 2 to start it (use --run to insist).
> # mdadm --run /dev/md127
> mdadm: started array /dev/md/lv-raid
> # vgchange -a y /dev/VolGroup
> 1 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup" now active
> # fsck.ext4 -n -f /dev/VolGroup/root
> e2fsck 1.44.1 (24-Mar-2018)
> Resize inode not valid. Recreate? no
>
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Inode 7 has illegal block(s). Clear? no
>
> Illegal indirect block (1714656753) in inode 7. IGNORED.
> Error while iterating over blocks in inode 7: Illegal indirect block found
>
> /dev/VolGroup/root: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
>
> e2fsck: aborted
>
> /dev/VolGroup/root: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
>
> # vgchange -a n /dev/VolGroup
> 0 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup" now active
> # mdadm --stop /dev/md127
> mdadm: stopped /dev/md127
>
> There are no panics or anything in dmesg. The directory structure of the first
> disk is intact, but the second disk only has Lost+Found present.
>
> I can confirm it is the patches listed at the top of the email, but I have not
> had an opportunity to bisect to find the exact root cause. I will do that once
> we confirm what Ubuntu stable kernels are affected and begin reverting the
> patches.
>
> Let me know if you need any more details.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew Ruffell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists