[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13d04c4cc769ebd1dd58470f4d22ada5c9cd28e7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 21:01:49 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into
original patch
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> If not "Adjusted-by", what about "Tweaked-by", "Helped-by",
> "Corrected-by"?
Improved-by: / Enhanced-by: / Revisions-by:
Or simply don't use anything but a link to the conversion thread
like Konstantin suggested.
I still want to know what actual value these things have and to whom.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists