[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201209075849.GD2767@kadam>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:58:49 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into
original patch
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:01:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > If not "Adjusted-by", what about "Tweaked-by", "Helped-by",
> > "Corrected-by"?
>
> Improved-by: / Enhanced-by: / Revisions-by:
>
I don't think we should give any credit for improvements or enhancements,
only for fixes. Complaining about style is its own reward.
Having to redo a patch is already a huge headache. Normally, I already
considered the reviewer's prefered style and decided I didn't like it.
Then to make me redo the patch in an ugly style and say thankyou on
top of that??? Forget about it. Plus, as a reviewer I hate reviewing
patches over and over.
I've argued for years that we should have a Fixes-from: tag. The zero
day bot is already encouraging people to add Reported-by tags for this
and a lot of people do.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists