[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63057f61-85e5-4720-3532-1a1ba05ab41a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:01:27 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: no-copy bvec for direct IO
On 09/12/2020 08:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * In practice groups of pages tend to be accessed/reclaimed/refaulted
>> + * together. To not go over bvec for those who didn't set BIO_WORKINGSET
>> + * approximate it by looking at the first page and inducing it to the
>> + * whole bio
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(PageWorkingset(iter->bvec->bv_page)))
>> + bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_WORKINGSET);
>
> IIRC the feedback was that we do not need to deal with BIO_WORKINGSET
> at all for direct I/O.
I was waiting for the conversation to unfold, i.e. for Johannes to
answer. BTW, would the same (skipping BIO_WORKINGSET) stand true for
iomap?
>
>> + bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF);
>> +
>> + iter->count = 0;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> This helper should go into bio.c, next to bio_iov_iter_get_pages.
> And please convert the other callers of bio_iov_iter_get_pages to this
> scheme as well.
Agree. In the end I want to merge that into bio_iov_iter_get_pages().
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists