[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160763440177.1580929.656020512153968577@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:06:41 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function that's not 0
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-12-09 16:41:02)
> There's currently a comment in the code saying function 0 is GPIO.
> Instead of hardcoding it, let's add a member where an SoC can specify
> it. No known SoCs use a number other than 0, but this just makes the
> code clearer. NOTE: no SoC code needs to be updated since we can rely
> on zero-initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists