[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b4fa89e-8dbd-faed-ec26-8ee2e6e1268a@prevas.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:52:22 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and
simplifications
On 05/12/2020 22.27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look.
>>>
>>> Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see)
>>
>> I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to
>> comment.
>
> Sure, makes sense.
>
>>> rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/
>>
>> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree.
Li, any preference? Will you take this series, or are you ok with the
three soc/fsl/qe patches going through the net tree along with the rest?
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists