linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and simplifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:52:22 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and
 simplifications

On 05/12/2020 22.27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look.
>>>
>>> Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see)  
>>
>> I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to
>> comment.
> 
> Sure, makes sense.
> 
>>> rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/  
>>
>> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree.

Li, any preference? Will you take this series, or are you ok with the
three soc/fsl/qe patches going through the net tree along with the rest?

Rasmus