lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b4fa89e-8dbd-faed-ec26-8ee2e6e1268a@prevas.dk>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:52:22 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and
 simplifications

On 05/12/2020 22.27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look.
>>>
>>> Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see)  
>>
>> I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to
>> comment.
> 
> Sure, makes sense.
> 
>>> rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/  
>>
>> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree.

Li, any preference? Will you take this series, or are you ok with the
three soc/fsl/qe patches going through the net tree along with the rest?

Rasmus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ