[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33816fa937efc8d4865d95754965e59ccfb75f2c.camel@infinera.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:17:42 +0000
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com>
To: "rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk" <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "leoyang.li@....com" <leoyang.li@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"murali.policharla@...adcom.com" <murali.policharla@...adcom.com>,
"vladimir.oltean@....com" <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"qiang.zhao@....com" <qiang.zhao@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: set dev->max_mtu to 1518
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 02:25 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > All the buffers and registers are already set up appropriately for an
> > MTU slightly above 1500, so we just need to expose this to the
> > networking stack. AFAICT, there's no need to implement .ndo_change_mtu
> > when the receive buffers are always set up to support the max_mtu.
> >
> > This fixes several warnings during boot on our mpc8309-board with an
> > embedded mv88e6250 switch:
> >
> > mv88e6085 mdio@...02120:10: nonfatal error -34 setting MTU 1500 on port 0
> > ...
> > mv88e6085 mdio@...02120:10: nonfatal error -34 setting MTU 1500 on port 4
> > ucc_geth e0102000.ethernet eth1: error -22 setting MTU to 1504 to include DSA overhead
> >
> > The last line explains what the DSA stack tries to do: achieving an MTU
> > of 1500 on-the-wire requires that the master netdevice connected to
> > the CPU port supports an MTU of 1500+the tagging overhead.
> >
> > Fixes: bfcb813203e6 ("net: dsa: configure the MTU for switch ports")
> > Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> Andrew
I don't see this in any kernel, seems stuck? Maybe because the series as a whole is not approved?
Jocke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists