[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210081802.GS3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:18:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Aurelien Jacquiot <jacquiot.aurelien@...il.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: blk-iocost: fix build for ARCH with missing
local64.h files
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:16:20PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/9/20 10:07 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:46:57PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> When building block/blk-iocost.c on arch/x6x/ or arch/nios2/, the
> >> build fails due to missing the <asm/local64.h> file.
> >
> > Please mark it mandatory-y if the asm-generic version is suitable
> > for everyone and random pieces of kernel code are supposed to include
> > it.
>
> include/asm-generic/local64.h has comments about some $arch could do
> its things better/faster instead of using asm-generic, but no $arch has
> done that since 2010 when it was added.
Yeah, it's only 32bit archs, and of those I'm only sure i386 could do it
better, very maybe arm-v7. But nobody cares enough to make it happen.
All the 64bit archs are already good, because local_t is long and
local64_t defaults to local_t.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists