[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1c56bdf-6f0c-2372-4705-9be4584094bd@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:10:19 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<lenb@...nel.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<dwagner@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] Driver core: platform: Add
devm_platform_get_irqs_affinity()
On 09/12/2020 19:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I'd like to have the irq maintainers/developers ack this before
>> taking it in the driver core, as someone is going to have to maintain
>> this crazy thing for forever if it gets merged.
>
> I'm actually quite happy with this, and as it turns out, the crazy
> system that has this SAS thing keeps my backside warm all year long.
> As long as this machine keeps ticking, I'm happy to help with this.
>
> So if that helps:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cheers
>
> We need to work out the merge strategy for the whole lot though, given
> that it crosses 3 subsystems over two series...
Thomas originally suggested taking the genirq change himself and then
providing a tag for others to merge:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/87h7qf1yp0.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Not sure if that still stands. The small ACPI change could go in a cycle
after rest merged, but may be best not to split up.
The worst that will happen without Marc's series is that is remove +
re-probe the SCSI driver is broken, so I'm happy as long as that ends up
in same kernel version somehow:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201129135208.680293-1-maz@kernel.org/
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists